Your audience is more likely to agree on which type of definitions of a word?

The most appropriate choice in this case is denotative definitions. Denotative definitions provide the literal, dictionary meaning of a word and are intended to be objective and universally understood. They eliminate ambiguity and subjective interpretation, ensuring that all audience members share the same understanding of the term being discussed.

This clarity is crucial in public speaking, where communicating ideas effectively depends on the audience's comprehension of the vocabulary used. When speakers rely on denotative definitions, they can establish a common ground, reducing the risks of misunderstanding and enhancing the effectiveness of their message.

In contrast, connotative definitions encompass the emotional and associative meanings that a word may carry for individuals. These meanings can vary significantly among audience members based on their personal experiences, cultural backgrounds, and perspectives. As a result, relying on connotative definitions may lead to varied interpretations, making it less likely for the audience to find consensus on the meaning of the term.

Although both types of definitions can be valuable in different contexts, denotative definitions foster a clearer and more shared understanding among the audience, making them the more reliable choice for achieving agreement.